Arya Tschand

Rapid adoption of machine learning (ML) technologies has led to a surge in power consumption across diverse systems, from tiny IoT devices to massive datacenter clusters. Benchmarking the energy efficiency of these systems is crucial for optimization, but presents novel challenges due to the variety of hardware platforms, workload characteristics, and system-level interactions. This paper introduces MLPerf Power, a comprehensive benchmarking methodology with capabilities to evaluate the energy efficiency of ML systems at power levels ranging from microwatts to megawatts. Developed by a consortium of industry professionals from more than 20 organizations, MLPerf Power establishes rules and best practices to ensure comparability across diverse architectures. We use representative workloads from the MLPerf benchmark suite to collect 1,841 reproducible measurements from 60 systems across the entire range of ML deployment scales. Our analysis reveals trade-offs between performance, complexity, and energy efficiency across this wide range of systems, providing actionable insights for designing optimized ML solutions from the smallest edge devices to the largest cloud infrastructures. This work emphasizes the importance of energy efficiency as a key metric in the evaluation and comparison of the ML system, laying the foundation for future research in this critical area. We discuss the implications for developing sustainable AI solutions and standardizing energy efficiency benchmarking for ML systems.

Experiments with computer processors must account for the inherent variability in executions. Prior work has shown that real systems exhibit variability, and random effects must be injected into simulators to account for it. Thus, we can run multiple executions of a given benchmark and generate a distribution of results. Prior work uses standard statistical techniques that are not suitable. While the result distributions may take any forms that are unknown a priori, many works naively assume they are Gaussian, which can be far from the truth. To allow rigorous evaluation for arbitrary result distributions, we introduce statistical model checking (SMC) to the world of computer architecture. SMC is a statistical technique that is used in research communities that depend heavily on statistical guarantees. SMC provides a rigorous mathematical methodology that employs experimental sampling for probabilistic evaluation of properties of interest, such that one can determine with a desired confidence whether a property (e.g., System X is 1.1x faster than System Y) is true or not. SMC alone is not enough for computer architects to draw conclusions based on their data. We create an end-to-end framework called SMC for Processor Analysis (SPA) which utilizes SMC techniques to provide insightful conclusions given experimental data.

We introduce QuArch, a dataset of 1500 humanvalidated question-answer pairs designed to evaluate and enhance language models’ understanding of computer architecture. The dataset covers areas including processor design, memory systems, and performance optimization. Our analysis highlights a significant performance gap: the best closed-source model achieves 84% accuracy, while the top small open-source model reaches 72%. We observe notable struggles in memory systems, interconnection networks, and benchmarking. Fine-tuning with QuArch improves small model accuracy by up to 8%, establishing a foundation for advancing AI-driven computer architecture research. The dataset and leaderboard are at our website